CARE-MS I
Alemtuzumab
CARE-MS I confirmed superior relapse control with two annual alemtuzumab courses versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in treatment-naïve early RRMS.
- Phase
- Phase III
- Population
- Treatment-naïve relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
- Controlled period
- Aug 2007 — Apr 2011
What was compared
Alemtuzumab
12 mg/day IV for 5 days at baseline and 3 days at month 12
n=386 randomizedInterferon beta-1a
44 μg subcutaneously three times weekly
n=195 randomizedPrimary endpoint
Relapse and 6-month sustained disability accumulation
2 years
Primary endpoint results
Participants with a relapse
Participants with relapse (%)
6-month sustained disability accumulation
Participants with progression (%)
Relapse rate was 54.9% lower (P<0.0001); disability accumulation did not differ significantly (HR 0.70; P=0.22).
Selected secondary outcomes
78% with alemtuzumab versus 59% with interferon beta-1a at 2 years.
Study population
- Randomized
- 581 randomized; 563 in primary analyses
- Age
- Mean 33.1 years; eligible 18–50
- Sex
- 365 women (65% of primary-analysis population)
- Disability
- EDSS 0–3.0
- Disease definition
- Treatment-naïve, early active relapsing-remitting MS
Who entered the trial
Key inclusion criteria
- MS symptom onset within 5 years
- At least two attacks in 2 years, including at least one in the prior year
- No prior disease-modifying therapy and baseline EDSS 0–3.0
Key exclusion criteria
- Any progressive form of MS
- Prior MS therapy other than corticosteroids or prior immunosuppression
- Significant autoimmune disease, cytopenia, bleeding disorder, or malignancy
Safety signal
- Infusion-associated reactions occurred in 90% of alemtuzumab-treated participants; 3% were serious.
- Infections and autoimmune thyroid events required structured long-term monitoring.
Why it mattered
CARE-MS I translated the CAMMS223 efficacy signal into a phase III first-line population and established a two-course induction regimen.
Important limitation
The trial met the relapse but not the disability coprimary endpoint, and rater blinding could not fully remove differences in treatment experience.