PRISMS

Subcutaneous interferon beta-1a

PRISMS demonstrated dose-related clinical and MRI efficacy of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a given three times weekly.

Phase
Phase III
Population
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
Controlled period
May 1994 — Feb 1997

What was compared

RandomizedDouble-blindPlacebo-controlled22 centers
Intervention

Interferon beta-1a 44 μg

Subcutaneously three times weekly

n=184
Comparator

Placebo

Matching subcutaneous injection three times weekly

n=187

Additional randomized arm

Interferon beta-1a 22 μg

Subcutaneously three times weeklyn=189
560 randomized2 years controlled phase

Primary endpoint

Prespecified outcome

Mean relapses per patient

2 years

Outcome figure

Primary endpoint results

Intervention Comparator or reference

Mean relapses per participant

Mean relapses

2 years
Interferon beta-1a 44 μg
1.73
Interferon beta-1a 22 μg
1.82
Placebo
2.56

33% and 27% relative reductions for the 44 μg and 22 μg doses.

Selected secondary outcomes

Disability

Both doses delayed defined disability progression versus placebo.

MRI

Active lesions and accumulated burden of disease were lower with both doses.

Study population

Randomized
560 randomized
Age
18–50 years eligible
Disability
EDSS 0–5.0
Disease definition
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Who entered the trial

Key inclusion criteria

  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
  • At least two relapses during the previous 2 years
  • Baseline EDSS 0–5.0

Key exclusion criteria

  • Progressive MS without qualifying relapses
  • Recent corticosteroid or immunosuppressive treatment
  • Major systemic illness or pregnancy

Safety signal

  • The primary report described both regimens as generally well tolerated.
  • Influenza-like symptoms, injection-site reactions, and laboratory abnormalities are central interferon-associated tolerability considerations.

Why it mattered

PRISMS established the clinical and radiologic evidence base for a higher-frequency subcutaneous interferon regimen.

Important limitation

The principal efficacy comparison involved two active doses and placebo; the study did not directly compare this regimen with other interferon products.

Suggest an update